__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
HMRC’s definition of a “tax adviser” under the new regime is deliberately broad. It goes beyond those who formally present themselves as specialists.
If your firm submits Stamp Duty returns, corresponds with HMRC for a client, or handles any part of a client’s tax interaction, you are likely within scope. That includes work arising as part of conveyancing or private client matters.
The Law Society has already highlighted that many conveyancers may not yet recognise their exposure. That’s a point worth pausing on.
Conveyancing may not feel like tax advice, but for HMRC, submitting a return on behalf of a client is enough to trigger the requirement. The threshold is low. The obligation that follows is not.
“For firms already operating with robust procedures and clear documentation, the administrative burden should be manageable. The greater risk lies in lack of awareness.”
Huzaifah Malik, Head of Stamp Taxes
Firms with an existing Agent Services Account are not required to re-register immediately, although HMRC may seek further information to confirm that existing arrangements remain compliant. For others, a staged registration window applies with a three-month period to complete the process.
The deadlines are firm, and the consequence of missing them is not a penalty in the conventional sense: it is an inability to act for clients before HMRC at all.
That operational consequence is what distinguishes this reform from much of the compliance landscape. It is not primarily a financial risk. It is a practice risk one that if realised would affect a firm’s ability to serve clients in a fundamental way.
It would be a mistake to view this as a standalone change. It forms part of a wider shift by HMRC to tighten oversight of who engages with them, particularly in areas involving professional judgement, such as SDLT.
Expectations around evidence and documentation have been increasing for some time. This regime formalises a standard that was previously implied.
For firms already operating with clear processes and well-documented files, the transition should be straightforward. For others, this may prompt a broader review of how Stamp positions are formed, evidenced, and recorded.
There are also practical considerations around how this interacts with existing regulatory frameworks, including the SRA. For smaller firms especially, the overlap in obligations and the resource required shouldn’t be underestimated.
This reform is ultimately less about process than it is about establishing a defined standard for how firms engage with HMRC from now on.
For firms that already operate with discipline and structure, the principal task is ensuring registration is completed in time. For those who have not yet engaged with the question, the more pressing task is understanding that it applies to them at all.
Lack of awareness, at this stage, remains the major risk. The regime will not make allowances for firms that were unaware of their obligations. Acting now to confirm scope, check existing arrangements and register where required.
Acting now to confirm scope, review existing arrangements, and register where required will ensure you remain in a position to support your clients without disruption.
If you’d like to know whether this applies to your firm, or how best to approach registration, we’re here to help.
Our team at Bonham & Brook has over 30 years of combined experience in property tax and can guide you through every step.
Give us a call on 020 3523 9125 or email hmalik@bonhamandbrook.co.uk to get started.
SDLT Consultant
Book a Meeting with Huzaifah here